May 26, 2022

More than 300 senior staff in England, polled by the NHS Confederation, found that 79% of the public do not strongly agree or disagree with the plan to block free access to Cowed 19 tests.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson is expected to unveil his plan to live with the corona virus on Monday, with ministers advising that free trials be stopped.

Sign up Get the latest corona virus news on our Public Interest Bulletins.

Sign up Get the latest corona virus news on our Public Interest Bulletins.

In the survey, 94% of the 307 NHS leaders agreed that screening of health workers and other key workers should continue. Currently NHS staff are asked to test at home twice a week.

Lateral Flow Test Kit

The survey also found that more than three-quarters of people would not agree with the removal of the legal requirement to disassociate themselves after a positive Quode result, and this is only in favor of consultation.

In addition, more than four out of five (82%) would oppose eliminating the wearing of mandatory masks in NHS and care homes.

The NHS Confederation is urging a cautious approach, warning that planned maintenance and access to the NHS could be disrupted if more waves of the quail catch up or become more diverse.

Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: “Corona virus-related hospital admissions and deaths are declining nationally, allowing the NHS to bring back many normal services. Was asked to be deprived during the peak of epidemic diseases. Some hasty election procedures.

Armed Forces Minister James Happy, who said the UK would need to reconsider its approach to infectious disease measures such as background flow tests, amid reports that free supplies could be scrapped. Is.

“With the success of the vaccine and the new treatment of covid, it provides real hope as we learn to live with the virus.

But the government cannot wave the magic wand and pretend that the threat is completely gone.

“There is still a lot of uncertainty, including the emergence of our long-term immunity and future tensions, which requires a solid testing infrastructure and clear guidance on isolation.

“If the government is getting too dumb in its plans to get rid of the epidemic, then there is a lot at stake for the NHS’s rehabilitation intentions, which is why health leaders are calling for a cautious and evidence-based approach. It should not be for political expediency. “

Responding to the survey, an NHS leader said: “Masks will protect vulnerable patients who would otherwise be afraid to come in, and protect our staff from cod and other circulating respiratory viruses. Stop wearing masks. So the levels are still too high.

In addition, in the survey, 83% of health leaders said they did not want the weekly Office for National Statistics Infection Survey to be abandoned or left behind, as reported.

Professor Dame Helen Stokes Lampard, chairwoman of the Royal Academy of Medical Colleges, said: “This survey confirms what many of us have been thinking and saying since the announcement of the relaxation of the initial laws in England.

“It simply came to our notice then.

“We have to learn to live safely with code in the medium term. That doesn’t mean our health is at risk and in some cases life doesn’t exist.”

“We need to take a more gradual, step-by-step approach to relaxing the rules and look carefully at what happens to infection rates – especially in healthcare settings or other environments where people in particular There is danger.

“We also need to continue the ONS survey of cases so that we have accurate data on which to base future decisions.”

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has also demanded that the government provide strong scientific evidence to support any project, as it has warned of the legal need to isolate itse
lf after a positive test. Ending would be a “leap into the dark.”

RCN chief executive Pat Cullen said mixed messaging around the Covid 19 response would endanger health care workers and patients.

“Eliminating the legal requirement to isolate oneself after a positive test is a big leap in the dark. Our members, for whom this epidemic is not over yet, need to know that there is a There is a solid scientific basis. “

“Instead of transferring the money and leaving it up to employers and individuals to decide, ministers should take up the issue and come up with a clear plan for the health and social care staff,” he added.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.